Uilenkamp - Meander reconnection

From REFORM wiki
Revision as of 10:15, 13 July 2010 by Sven Teurlincx (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Uilenkamp - Meander reconnection


Factsheet: Uilenkamp - Meander reconnection

General
Country NL
River Name Overijsselse Vecht
Site Name Uilenkamp - Meander reconnection
River Characterisation
    River typology
    Location (Lat Lon) 52.5282323822381, 6.56360149383545
    Altitude lowland: < 200 m
    Catchment area large: > 1000 - 10000 km2
    Geology Siliceous
    National code/
    River type name
    R7
    Hydromorphological quality elements

    Biological quality elements
    Ecosystem Services
    EU Directives
    Pressures
    Measures
    Other
    Project size 24 ha
    Approximate costs
    Synergy Flood protection
    Status
    Period of realization 2004-2006
    Evaluation Ecological change
    Implemented by Waterschap Velt & Vecht


    Key features of the case study

    Site description

    The Vecht river has served as a shipping route in the past. Nowadays it is no longer used for this commercial function. This has made it possible to go from a deep, straightened river to a more natural situation. A first step in this direction was taken by the local water authority with funding of the EU Interreg project. The site of Uilenkamp is a meander that was cut off at the start of the last century to make the Vecht river more suitable for navigation. The banks of the river were fixated and the channel straightened and deepened. This has led to an unnatural channel with relatively few chances for biota to flourish due to the lack of habitat diversity.

    Measures selection

    To reintroduce natural dynamics and create a more natural river the old meander of Uilenkamp was reconnected to the river Vecht. Bank fixation was removed along the (former) main channel and used to construct a dam that blocks of the main channel during normal flow conditions. This forces the main flow through the reconnected meander and allows for natural processes such as erosion to take place. During peak flows and high water conditions the dam is flooded and water can also flow through the former channel. This measure has led to an increase in river length of 1 km, which leads to increased water retention in dry periods. Also, the water storage capacity of the area was increase. Part of this was done by lowering a nearby floodplain (formerly agricultural land) and digging a number of pools in the area.

    Success criteria

    • Reintroduction of natural processes
    • Increased water retention
    • Preservation of flood protection for surrounding areas

    Ecological response

    Macrophytes and phytobenthos

    The macrophytes have developed quite well at the site. No historical reference has been determined, leading to a limited knowledge of the reference condition of the site. However, it can be stated that the vegetation shows more diversity in species than nearby, unaltered, sites. Despite this improvement it should be stated that the development of reed-like vegetation has been largely absent. This can be explained by the unnatural water level fluctuations in the river. This leads to the banks being flooded during the germination season of the vegetation, thus making it impossible for the plants to colonise the banks successfully. The phytobenthos, in the form of diatoms, shows no characteristic or rare species. Analysis shows that the species that occur in the channel are indicative of eutrophic water.

    Benthic invertebrates

    The benthic invertebrates are largely non-rheophilic species. Some rheophelic, and thus characteristic species for the current situation, do occur in the channel but only during spring. This is caused by the stagnation of the water flow during summer due to the operation of weirs in the river system. This leads to an unnatural but agriculturally desirable system. To further improve the system for rheophilic species a different hydrological regime is needed.

    Fish

    Not monitored

    Other biota

    Dragonflies

    A number of dragon fly species were found in the area. The new channel is home to brood of a number of these species, indicating colonisation of the channel. The bank of the old channel are poor in dragonflies due to the lack of diversity in the vegetation. Overall an increase in dragonfly species diversity was found in the meander compared to the former channel.

    Hydromorphological response

    Though hydromorphological response has not been studied intensively some general observations can be presented.

    Hydrological regime

    The hydrology of the river has changed in the sense that the water retention has been improved and that the storage capacity of the system was increased by lowering the nearby floodplain. This, in turn, improved the lateral connectivity and the inundation of the floodplain area. The unnatural water level fluctuations and stagnation of the water flow are the major hydrological pressures acting upon the system, and they persist still.

    River continuity

    Unaffected

    Morphological conditions

    Erosion and sedimentation has begun in the side channel and is creating a more natural river. Characteristic bank faces have formed which serve as habitat for numerous biota. The variation in river depth has increased and the channel bed is taking on a more natural form and dimension now that it is no longer fixated.

    Monitoring before and after implementation of the project

    The project has not been monitored prior to the implementation of the project. In 2005 and 2006 data on both benthic invertebrates and macrophytes was collected by Klink Ecological Advisory under contract by the local water authority Velt & Vecht. In 2005 the study included dragonflies and in 2006 diatoms were monitored.

    Socio-economic aspects

    Ecosystem goods and services

    Not affected.

    Conflicts and synergies

    The project is an example of recycling on site material for the restoration project. The dam that was build in the former main channel was constructed by using the bank fixation which was removed as part of the project.

    Project costs

    Unknown

    Contact person within the organization

    Jan van der Molen, Waterschap Velt & Vecht, e-mail

    Extra background information

    References


    Related Measures

    Related Pressures