Difference between revisions of "Lippeaue Klostermersch"

From REFORM wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Site description)
(Undo revision 29001 by Benjamin Kupilas (talk))
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
[[File:Lippe_1.jpg|300px|thumb|left|Lippe river]]
 
[[File:Lippe_1.jpg|300px|thumb|left|Lippe river]]
 +
 +
[[File:Lippe_2.jpg|300px|thumb|left|Lippe river]]
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
  
 
==Measures selection==
 
==Measures selection==

Latest revision as of 14:34, 27 May 2014

Lippeaue Klostermersch


Factsheet: Lippeaue Klostermersch

General
Country DE
River Name Lippe
Site Name Lippeaue Klostermersch
River Characterisation
River typology
Location (Lat Lon) 51.6614290633956, 8.22996139526367
Altitude lowland: < 200 m
Catchment area large: > 1000 - 10000 km2
Geology Calcareous
National code/
River type name
Type 15
Hydromorphological quality elements

Biological quality elements
Ecosystem Services
EU Directives
Pressures
Measures
Other
Project size 2 km
Approximate costs > 1 000 000 Euros
Synergy
Status Realised
Period of realization 1996-1997
Evaluation Hydromorphological and ecological changes
Implemented by Staatliches Umweltamt Lippstadt, Lipperoder Str. 8, 59555 Lippstadt, Germany, monitoring and planning also done by NGO: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Biologischer Umweltschutz www.abu-naturschutz.de


Key features of the case study

The restoration project in the floodplain of the Lippe river called "Klostermersch" is part of a restoration programme of the German federal state Northrhine-Westphalia that started in 1990 called "Gewässeraueprogramm" (river floodplain programme). So one of the major objectives of this programme was to restore river reaches including the surrounding floodplain, an aspect which is often neglected, even in the Programmes of Measures of the WFD.

Site description

The Lippe is a typical lowland sand and loam dominated river. Sine it has been altered since the Roman age and straightened as well as deepened it was difficult to assess the natural stable channel form of the river reach.

Lippe river
Lippe river
























Measures selection

A 2 km reach was restored in 1996-1997. The bank fixation (riprap) was removed, the former channel was filled, channel bed was heightened by 2 m to connect the Lippe and its former floodplain and widened from 13 to 45 m. Several large trees were placed in the reach to initiate natural channel dynamics and to increase local depth variability. Floodplain land-use was restricted to extensive grazing to allow for natural succession of floodplain vegetation and the agricultural drainage system was filled, except some local ponds. A ramp was build at the downstream end to prevent channel incision.

Success criteria

Ecological response

A biological monitoring showed that species composition did still adjust to the changing morphological conditions several years after implementation of the project, i.e. is highly dynamic. Fish were monitored using a Before / After Impact / Control design (BACI). Most fish naturally occurring in the Lippe were already present prior to the restoration but abundance of many species did increase in the restored reach. Solely the abundance of eels was lower in the restored reach compared to the control reach since eels used riprap as cover. On the floodplain, amphibians recovered more slowly compared to fish, probably due to the lower re-colonization potential.

Hydromorphological response

Within a four year monitoring period, channel morphology consistently changed, depth variability increased and channel morphology was still adjusting to the post-project conditions; sediment balance was positive. The monitoring results indicate that the channel was slightly over-widened and in future projects, narrower channels will be build to allow for more natural channel dynamics (let the river do the work).

Monitoring before and after implementation of the project

The fish monitoring was desinged as a Before/After Impact/Control (BACI design). Hence, it was possible to investigate if the fish species composition and abundance did change after implementation of the project comapared to a control site (Impact/Control) and to investigate if these changes can be attributed to the restoration measures or if they also occur in the control reach (Before/After).

Socio-economic aspects

Contact person within the organization

Extra background information

References


Related Measures

Related Pressures