Difference between revisions of "Effect of vegetation on hydromorphodynamics"
m |
(→Vegetation and bank dynamics) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
===Vegetation and bank dynamics=== | ===Vegetation and bank dynamics=== | ||
+ | Tables 3 and 4 summarise the suitability of models with bank stability and accretion, respectively, for the analysis of hydromorphological pressures or the design of restoration measures. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:VegHymoInteractions_BankStab.png|center|thumb|500px| Table 3. Summary of model characteristics on vegetation and bank stability.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:VegHymoInteractions_BankAcc.png|center|thumb|500px| Table 4. Summary of model characteristics on vegetation and bank accretion.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Future research and modelling challenges: | ||
+ | |||
+ | - More work is needed to better understand the hydrological effects of riparian vegetation and to incorporate them into models of bank erosion and failures. | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Another area of knowledge gaps concerns modelling interactions of the various erosion processes and mass failures, and the relative role of vegetation on near-bank hydrodynamic flow conditions, erodibility parameters, and shear strength. In order to extend results from a bank profile to a reach and account for variability of hydrodynamic, geotechnical, and vegetational conditions, vegetation should be included into 3-D morphodynamic models. | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Concerning bank accretion modelling is still in its infancy. Recommendations relate to three main aspects: the inclusion of vegetation dynamics, the influence of the high variability of flows, and the up-scaling of the effects acting at different scales. |
Revision as of 18:19, 30 June 2015
Vegetation can influence river hydrodynamics by changing the turbulent flow field and the averaged velocity profiles in comparison with those that can be commonly found in
non-vegetated flows. In this way, vegetation potentially has a relevant effect on flow resistance, sediment transport and bank dynamics (see Table 1).
Vegetation and flow resistance
Future research is needed on the following topics:
- effect of different types and growth stages of vegetation (rigid or flexible) and different vegetation densities on flow turbulence structure and secondary currents of a stream;
- effect of plant reconfiguration with increasing flow velocity on drag;
- effect of the spatial distribution of vegetation at a reach scale on flow resistance;
- uprooting, breakage of plants during high-flow conditions may give rise to significant changes in flow resistance between the rising and falling limbs of the hydrograph;
- develop suitable parameterization to characterize different species.
Vegetation and bank dynamics
Tables 3 and 4 summarise the suitability of models with bank stability and accretion, respectively, for the analysis of hydromorphological pressures or the design of restoration measures.
Future research and modelling challenges:
- More work is needed to better understand the hydrological effects of riparian vegetation and to incorporate them into models of bank erosion and failures.
- Another area of knowledge gaps concerns modelling interactions of the various erosion processes and mass failures, and the relative role of vegetation on near-bank hydrodynamic flow conditions, erodibility parameters, and shear strength. In order to extend results from a bank profile to a reach and account for variability of hydrodynamic, geotechnical, and vegetational conditions, vegetation should be included into 3-D morphodynamic models.
- Concerning bank accretion modelling is still in its infancy. Recommendations relate to three main aspects: the inclusion of vegetation dynamics, the influence of the high variability of flows, and the up-scaling of the effects acting at different scales.