Difference between revisions of "Freshwater Pearl Mussel and its habitats (LIFE04/NAT/SE/00023)"

From REFORM wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Freshwater Pearl Mussel and its habitats (LIFE04/NAT/SE/00023))
(Key features of the case study)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
    
 
    
 
==Key features of the case study==
 
==Key features of the case study==
 
+
 Drivers
 +
 
 +
Main concerns: Ecological concerns
 +
Legal requirements: Natura 2000
 +
Opportunities: Broader management plan (swedish national conservation plan)
 +
 
 +
95 % of the Fresh Pearl water mussel population in Central Europe has fallen. The specie is classified by IUCN as endangered and is included in the EU habitat directive. Sweden is home to a large part of the remaining population (a core area) and therefore have an international responsibility for the species’ long-term survival’.
 +
 
 +
 Pressures
 +
 
 +
Hydrological regime modification
 +
Artificial barries upstream from the site
 +
Artificial barries downstream from the site
 +
Alteration of instream habitats
 +
Sedimentation and sediment input
 +
Nutrients pollution
 +
Micropollutants
 +
Acidification
 +
 
 +
 Humans activities
 +
 
 +
Mainly forestry
 +
Agriculture
 +
 
 +
 Global objectives
 +
 
 +
Species enhancement and habitats improvement were the main objectives of the project by developing and testing methods to achieve a favourable conservation status for the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) in Sweden. However, freshwater mussel was not the only target specie of the project. A freshwater mussel population decrease highlights a deterioration of the environnment,  the improvement of freshwater mussels habitats will thus benefit other aquatic species such as host fish.
 +
 
 +
 Specific goals (process oriented)
 +
 
 +
In order to achieve the conservation of  Margaritifera margaritifera, the project aimed to :
 +
1. eliminate the  migration obstacles to host fish along ten watercourses,
 +
2. improve the river bed in eight watercourses,
 +
3. manage the banks along two small rivers
 +
4. Re-introduce young mussels (test in one stream)
 +
 
 +
 Measurable criteria
 +
 
 +
The mussel recruitment was expected within the coming 10–20 years. None measurable criteria were actually set in the frame of the LIFE project due its too short time frame. However, measurable criteria with regards to the Margaritifera margaritifera  recruitment have been set in the frame of the swedish national conservation plan (XX).
  
 
==Site description==
 
==Site description==

Revision as of 15:36, 30 June 2011

Freshwater Pearl Mussel and its habitats (LIFE04/NAT/SE/00023)


Factsheet: Sweden- Restoration of the Freshwater Pearl Mussel and its habitats (LIFE04/NAT/SE/000231)

General
Country SE
River Name 21 different water courses
Site Name Sweden- Restoration of the Freshwater Pearl Mussel and its habitats (LIFE04/NAT/SE/000231)
River Characterisation
    River typology
    Location (Lat Lon) 59.1421349497426, 12.1728515625
    Altitude lowland: < 200 m
    Catchment area small: 10 - 100 km2
    Geology
    National code/
    River type name
    Hydromorphological quality elements

    Biological quality elements
    Ecosystem Services
    EU Directives
    Pressures
    Measures
    Other
    Project size -1
    Approximate costs > 1 000 000 Euros
    Synergy
    Status Realised
    Period of realization 2004-2009
    Evaluation Hydromorphological and ecological changes
    Implemented by WWF Sweden


    Key features of the case study

     Drivers

    Main concerns: Ecological concerns Legal requirements: Natura 2000 Opportunities: Broader management plan (swedish national conservation plan)

    95 % of the Fresh Pearl water mussel population in Central Europe has fallen. The specie is classified by IUCN as endangered and is included in the EU habitat directive. Sweden is home to a large part of the remaining population (a core area) and therefore have an international responsibility for the species’ long-term survival’.

     Pressures

    Hydrological regime modification Artificial barries upstream from the site Artificial barries downstream from the site Alteration of instream habitats Sedimentation and sediment input Nutrients pollution Micropollutants Acidification

     Humans activities

    Mainly forestry Agriculture

     Global objectives

    Species enhancement and habitats improvement were the main objectives of the project by developing and testing methods to achieve a favourable conservation status for the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) in Sweden. However, freshwater mussel was not the only target specie of the project. A freshwater mussel population decrease highlights a deterioration of the environnment, the improvement of freshwater mussels habitats will thus benefit other aquatic species such as host fish.

     Specific goals (process oriented)

    In order to achieve the conservation of Margaritifera margaritifera, the project aimed to : 1. eliminate the migration obstacles to host fish along ten watercourses, 2. improve the river bed in eight watercourses, 3. manage the banks along two small rivers 4. Re-introduce young mussels (test in one stream)

     Measurable criteria

    The mussel recruitment was expected within the coming 10–20 years. None measurable criteria were actually set in the frame of the LIFE project due its too short time frame. However, measurable criteria with regards to the Margaritifera margaritifera recruitment have been set in the frame of the swedish national conservation plan (XX).

    Site description

    Measures selection

    Success criteria

    Ecological response

    Hydromorphological response

    Monitoring before and after implementation of the project

    Socio-economic aspects

    Contact person within the organization

    Extra background information

    References


    Related Measures

    Related Pressures