Difference between revisions of "Surface water abstraction"
(→General description) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Effect/Impact on (including literature citations)== | ==Effect/Impact on (including literature citations)== | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Dewson ''et al''. (2007)<ref>Dewson, Z.S., James, A.B.W. & Death, R.G., 2007. Stream ecosystem functioning under reduced flow conditions. Ecological Applications 17: 1797–1808.</ref> found that water abstraction decreased water velocity, water depth, and wetted channel width and changes in thermal regime and water chemistry in 90 % of the case studies analysed; James ''et al''. (2008)<ref>James, A.B.W., Dewson, Z.O.Ë.S., Death, R.G., 2008. Do stream macroinvertebrates use instream refugia in response to severe short-term flow reduction in New Zealand streams? Freshwater Biology 53: 1316–1334.</ref> found that flow reduction significantly decreased water velocity (60–69%) in all streams, while depth (18–61%) and wetted width (24–31%) also tended to decrease. Kleynhans (1996)<ref>Kleynhans, C., 1996. A qualitative procedure for the assessment of the habitat integrity status of the Luvuvhu River (Limpopo system, South Africa). Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery 5: 41–54.</ref> described loss of fast flowing instream habitat types in streams affected by water abstraction. | |
| − | + | Sedimentation process may increase and fine sediment deposition increases the most in farmland streams affected by water abstraction (James ''et al''. 2008)<ref>James, A.B.W., Dewson, Z.O.Ë.S., Death, R.G., 2008. Do stream macroinvertebrates use instream refugia in response to severe short-term flow reduction in New Zealand streams? Freshwater Biology 53: 1316–1334.</ref>. Also, with decreased flows the Coarse Particulate Organic Matter (CPOM) retention rate is increased (Dewson ''et al'', 2007)<ref>Dewson, Z.S., James, A.B.W. & Death, R.G., 2007. Stream ecosystem functioning under reduced flow conditions. Ecological Applications 17: 1797–1808.</ref>. If floods are reduced in main stem river channels, fine sediments delivered by less abstracted tributaries may no longer be flushed downstream but may accumulate on the river bed, reducing its permeability (Kondolf and Wilcock 1996)<ref>Kondolf, G. M., and P. R. Wilcock 1996. The flushing flow problem: defining and evaluating objectives. Water Resources Research 32: 2589-2599.</ref>. When water abstraction is intense, channel drought impacts may be disproportionately severe, especially when certain critical thresholds are exceeded. For example, ecological changes may be gradual while a riffle dries but cessation of flow causes abrupt loss of a specific habitat, alteration of physico-chemical conditions in pools downstream, and fragmentation of the river ecosystem (Boulton, 2003)<ref>Boulton, 2003. Parallels and contrasts in the effects of drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages - Google Académico. Freshwater Biology 48: 1173–1185.</ref>. | |
| + | |||
| + | Changes in thermal regime and water chemistry were found in rivers affected by flow withdrawals by Dewson ''et al''., (2007)<ref>Dewson, Z.S., James, A.B.W. & Death, R.G., 2007. Stream ecosystem functioning under reduced flow conditions. Ecological Applications 17: 1797–1808.</ref>, and James ''et al''. (2008)<ref>James, A.B.W., Dewson, Z.O.Ë.S., Death, R.G., 2008. Do stream macroinvertebrates use instream refugia in response to severe short-term flow reduction in New Zealand streams? Freshwater Biology 53: 1316–1334.</ref> found that flow reduction decreased the water temperature range by 18–26%, although it had little effect on average surface water temperatures. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reduced flows within some river reaches may present impassable obstacles for fish migrations, either by decreasing water depths to below critical levels or by completely drying up entire reaches of river, as occurs on the San Joaquin River of California as a consequence of diversions from Friant Dam (Cain 1997<ref>Cain, J. R. 1997. Hydrologic and geomorphic changes to the San Joaquin River between Friant Dam and Gravely Ford and implications for restoration of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Thesis. University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.</ref>). Also, where baseflows are artificially reduced, dissolved oxygen levels fall to lethal levels in reaches affected by eutrophic or high temperature discharges (e.g., Loire River, France), or dredging (e.g., the Lower San Joaquin River, California), preventing anadromous salmonids from migrating upstream to suitable habitats (Kondolf ''et al''., 2006<ref>Kondolf, G. M., A. J. Boulton, S. O'Daniel, G. C. Poole, F. J. Rahel, E. H. Stanley, E. Wohl, A. Bång, J. Carlstrom, C. Cristoni, H. Huber, S. Koljonen, P. Louhi, and K. Nakamura. 2006. Process-based ecological river restoration: visualizing three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages. Ecology and Society 11(2): 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art5/</ref>). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Water extraction can also entrain aquatic organisms. For example, Pringle and Scatena (1999)<ref>Pringle, C. M., and F. N. Scatena 1999 Freshwater resource development. case studies from Puerto Rico and Costa Rica. Pages 114-121 in L. U. Hatch and M. E. Swisher, editors. Managed ecosystems: the mesoamerican experience. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.</ref> showed that water extraction removes more than 50% of migrating shrimp larvae in a river located in the Caribbean National Forest in Puerto Rico. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In relation to macroinvertebrates, flow reduction has not been observed to impact on the abundance of common pool macroinvertebrates or on the abundance, vertical distribution or community composition of hyporheic macroinvertebrates. James ''et al''. (2008)<ref>James, A.B.W., Dewson, Z.O.Ë.S., Death, R.G., 2008. Do stream macroinvertebrates use instream refugia in response to severe short-term flow reduction in New Zealand streams? Freshwater Biology 53: 1316–1334.</ref> found that aquatic macroinvertebrates are resistant to short-term, severe flow reduction as long as some water remains. However, in general, invertebrate abundance may increase or decrease in response to decreased flow, whereas invertebrate richness commonly decreases because habitat diversity decreases (Dewson ''et al''., 2007<ref>Dewson, Z.S., James, A.B.W. & Death, R.G., 2007. A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates. Journal Information, 26(3).</ref>). Furthermore, Muñoz & Prat (1996) found a highly significant reduction of macroinvertebrate density and taxon number at disturbed stations as consequences of increased pollutant concentrations under abstraction conditions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In dry countries, deterioration of riparian habitat integrity is a widespread consequence of water abstraction: during droughts tree deaths are common (Kleynhans, 1996)<ref>Kleynhans, C., 1996. A qualitative procedure for the assessment of the habitat integrity status of the Luvuvhu River (Limpopo system, South Africa). Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery 5: 41–54.</ref>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Water abstraction SI.jpg|thumbnail|Conceptual framework representing water abstraction effects on HYMO processes and variables and their ecological impacts (HYMO is for Hydromorphological and PQ for Physico-chemical).]] | ||
| + | |||
==Case studies where this pressure is present== | ==Case studies where this pressure is present== | ||
<Forecasterlink type="getProjectsForPressures" code="P01" /> | <Forecasterlink type="getProjectsForPressures" code="P01" /> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 28: | ||
<Forecasterlink type="getMeasuresForPressures" code="P01" /> | <Forecasterlink type="getMeasuresForPressures" code="P01" /> | ||
==Useful references== | ==Useful references== | ||
| + | |||
==Other relevant information== | ==Other relevant information== | ||
[[Category:Pressures]][[Category:01. Water abstractions]] | [[Category:Pressures]][[Category:01. Water abstractions]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:28, 14 November 2016
Contents
Surface water abstraction
01. Water abstractions
General description
Water abstractions may be taken directly from the flowing waters in the channel (surface water abstraction), or indirectly from wells by pumping water from aquifers that may be closely connected to rivers (groundwater abstraction). Furthermore, water abstraction from rivers can be achieved through inter-basin flow transfer schemes, whereby the donor river system has its flow reduced below its diversion.
Effect/Impact on (including literature citations)
Dewson et al. (2007)[1] found that water abstraction decreased water velocity, water depth, and wetted channel width and changes in thermal regime and water chemistry in 90 % of the case studies analysed; James et al. (2008)[2] found that flow reduction significantly decreased water velocity (60–69%) in all streams, while depth (18–61%) and wetted width (24–31%) also tended to decrease. Kleynhans (1996)[3] described loss of fast flowing instream habitat types in streams affected by water abstraction. Sedimentation process may increase and fine sediment deposition increases the most in farmland streams affected by water abstraction (James et al. 2008)[4]. Also, with decreased flows the Coarse Particulate Organic Matter (CPOM) retention rate is increased (Dewson et al, 2007)[5]. If floods are reduced in main stem river channels, fine sediments delivered by less abstracted tributaries may no longer be flushed downstream but may accumulate on the river bed, reducing its permeability (Kondolf and Wilcock 1996)[6]. When water abstraction is intense, channel drought impacts may be disproportionately severe, especially when certain critical thresholds are exceeded. For example, ecological changes may be gradual while a riffle dries but cessation of flow causes abrupt loss of a specific habitat, alteration of physico-chemical conditions in pools downstream, and fragmentation of the river ecosystem (Boulton, 2003)[7].
Changes in thermal regime and water chemistry were found in rivers affected by flow withdrawals by Dewson et al., (2007)[8], and James et al. (2008)[9] found that flow reduction decreased the water temperature range by 18–26%, although it had little effect on average surface water temperatures.
Reduced flows within some river reaches may present impassable obstacles for fish migrations, either by decreasing water depths to below critical levels or by completely drying up entire reaches of river, as occurs on the San Joaquin River of California as a consequence of diversions from Friant Dam (Cain 1997[10]). Also, where baseflows are artificially reduced, dissolved oxygen levels fall to lethal levels in reaches affected by eutrophic or high temperature discharges (e.g., Loire River, France), or dredging (e.g., the Lower San Joaquin River, California), preventing anadromous salmonids from migrating upstream to suitable habitats (Kondolf et al., 2006[11]).
Water extraction can also entrain aquatic organisms. For example, Pringle and Scatena (1999)[12] showed that water extraction removes more than 50% of migrating shrimp larvae in a river located in the Caribbean National Forest in Puerto Rico.
In relation to macroinvertebrates, flow reduction has not been observed to impact on the abundance of common pool macroinvertebrates or on the abundance, vertical distribution or community composition of hyporheic macroinvertebrates. James et al. (2008)[13] found that aquatic macroinvertebrates are resistant to short-term, severe flow reduction as long as some water remains. However, in general, invertebrate abundance may increase or decrease in response to decreased flow, whereas invertebrate richness commonly decreases because habitat diversity decreases (Dewson et al., 2007[14]). Furthermore, Muñoz & Prat (1996) found a highly significant reduction of macroinvertebrate density and taxon number at disturbed stations as consequences of increased pollutant concentrations under abstraction conditions.
In dry countries, deterioration of riparian habitat integrity is a widespread consequence of water abstraction: during droughts tree deaths are common (Kleynhans, 1996)[15].
Case studies where this pressure is present
- sheet_pile_protected_shallow_new
- sheet_pile_protected_shallow
- Stream_-mending_the_Avon
- Pastures_Bridge_Rehabilitation
- Biodiversity_conservation_and_recovery_in_the_river_basin_of_Asón
- Improvement_of_aquatic_habitat_of_Segre_River__at_Alòs_de_Balaguer
- Restoration_and_remeandering_of_the_Müggelspree_-_downstream_Mönchwinkel
- Heltondale_Beck_Flow_restoration
Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures
- Improve water retention
- Recycle used water
- Reduce surface water abstraction without return
- Improve/Create water storage
- Reduce water consumption
- Create low flow channels in over-sized channels
- Reduce surface water abstraction with return
Useful references
Other relevant information
Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found
