Difference between revisions of "Hydrological regime assessment"
(→Other relevant information) |
m (→Other relevant information) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Table 1 lists key and analyzed references for methods of hydrological regime assessment. | Table 1 lists key and analyzed references for methods of hydrological regime assessment. | ||
− | [[File: | + | [[File:TableRef4.png|center|thumb|700px| Table 1. Analyzed references for methods of hydrological regime assessment.]] |
[[Category:Tools]][[Category:Hydromorphological assessment methods]] | [[Category:Tools]][[Category:Hydromorphological assessment methods]] |
Revision as of 17:35, 8 February 2013
Hydrological regime assessment
Type
Hydromorphological assessment methods
Brief description
Methods for the assessment of hydrological regime alteration analyze specific hydrological indicators of rivers and streams to assess the impact of human pressures on the hydrological regime. They often focus on alterations which affect the longitudinal continuity of water flow (e.g. intakes, impoundment, diversions) and mainly focus on the reach scale. Methods widely use models to obtain data from ungauged reaches or incomplete data series. We reviewed 10 methods in total (4 for European countries and 6 for non-European countries).
Strengths, limitations and gaps
Methods for the assessment of hydrological regime alteration make use of indicators derived by quantitative, statistical or physically-based models. This implies the use of existing large data sets and long-time series, which represent the main limitation. Moreover these methods often do not take into account small scale hydrological alterations (e.g. hydropeaking) as well as groundwater/surface interactions, important for organisms.
Other relevant information
Summary tables of analyzed assessment methods for hydrological regime are available here:
- For European countries: File:4 EU.pdf
- For non European countries: File:4 nonEU.pdf
In the table we recorded whether the analyzed method considers or not a specific feature. Three options were considered: presence (tick), absence ( ), and probably assessed (PA), the latter indicating when there is an uncertainty concerning whether the feature is collected and/or when the feature may be indirectly obtained.
Table 1 lists key and analyzed references for methods of hydrological regime assessment.