Difference between revisions of "Carrión"
From REFORM wiki
m (→Ecological response) |
m (→Hydromorphological response) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Hydromorphological response== | ==Hydromorphological response== | ||
+ | :* After three years, the plants from the live fences had rooted successfully, withstanding the river overflows. | ||
+ | :* Single stakes were carried during the floods of February 1996. | ||
+ | :* One year after restoration,the percentage of dead stakes of the buffer strip was lower than 3 %. It resisted overflows that surpassed the structure and flooded the poplar. | ||
==Monitoring before and after implementation of the project== | ==Monitoring before and after implementation of the project== |
Revision as of 16:40, 20 May 2010
Carrión
Key features of the case study
Attention: the source of the following text is "Estudio de técnicas de restauración ecológica aplicada a los principales habitat(MARM, 2010).
The Carrión river restoration located in Fresno del Río and Pino del Río (Palencia) covered a river reach with maximum flows between 218 and 527 m3/s, which is regulated by Camporredondo and Compuerto dams. The minimum flows is about 2 m3/s, set by the Confederación Hidrográfica del Duero. The concern about this reach was due to shore erosion and the lack of refuge for trout.
Site description
Measures selection
In order to mitigate the impact of flow regulation and to improve the aquatic habitat for fish, several actions took place both instream and at the riparian zone:
- Boulders (limestone) were placed in the riverbed for improve the instream structure and habitat diversity. The diameter of the boulders ranged between 60 - 80 cm.
- Revegetation of the margins with four live fences: 200 stakes of willows from the proximities of the site and four stakes of aspen (Populus tremula). Aspen stakes were around 2 m long and with a diameter of 2 cm (two years). They were embedded vertically into the soil with a slight inclination towards the slope, very close, filling the trench with the extracted material and compacting over the stakes.
- Revegetation with single stakes. Because of lack of time, they were left along the banks hardly embedded, just covered with slope material. They didn´t develop an important root system as they were near to the water table.
- Plantation of 170 stakes (75 % Salix fragilis and 25% of Salix purpurea and Salix atrocinerea), with the aim of protecting a plantation of poplars (adjust land use to prevent shore erosion )
- Construction of a wing deflector consisting of stones, logs, and branch cuttings of willow and aquatic plants for its stabilization.
- Plantation of branch cuttings and stakes of willow at stable margins to give shading and shelter for the trouts.
Success criteria
Ecological response
- At the first moment the presence of boulders involved a negative visual impact. however, the monitoring done by the Junta de Castilla y León through electrofishing proved the effectiveness of this action near some spawning areas.
- Trout population density was increased.
Hydromorphological response
- After three years, the plants from the live fences had rooted successfully, withstanding the river overflows.
- Single stakes were carried during the floods of February 1996.
- One year after restoration,the percentage of dead stakes of the buffer strip was lower than 3 %. It resisted overflows that surpassed the structure and flooded the poplar.
Monitoring before and after implementation of the project
Socio-economic aspects
Contact person within the organization
Extra background information
References
Related Measures
- Initiate natural channel dynamics to promote natural regeneration
- Add sediments
- Adjust land use to reduce nutrient, sediment input or shore erosion
- Revegetate riparian zones