Difference between revisions of "Template casestudies"
From REFORM wiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Key features of the case study== | ==Key features of the case study== | ||
| − | -> Short summary (max.100 words) | + | -> Short summary (max.100 words). |
==Site description== | ==Site description== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Measures selection== | ==Measures selection== | ||
| − | -> Motivation/argumentation behind the selection of the measures implemented | + | -> Motivation/argumentation behind the selection of the measures implemented. |
==Success criteria== | ==Success criteria== | ||
| − | -> Brief description of the parameters used to assess the success of the project | + | -> Brief description of the parameters used to assess the success of the project. |
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* Other biota | * Other biota | ||
| + | |||
==Hydromorphological response== | ==Hydromorphological response== | ||
| Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
==Monitoring before and after implementation of the project== | ==Monitoring before and after implementation of the project== | ||
| − | -> Brief description of available records | + | -> Brief description of available records and data ownership. |
| + | |||
==Socio-economic aspects== | ==Socio-economic aspects== | ||
| Line 47: | Line 49: | ||
* Project costs: | * Project costs: | ||
| + | |||
==Contact person within the organization== | ==Contact person within the organization== | ||
| − | -> Full name and email of a person within the organisation that implemented the project who can provide more detailed information. | + | -> Full name and email address of a person within the organisation that implemented the project who can provide more detailed information. |
| + | |||
==Extra background information== | ==Extra background information== | ||
Revision as of 16:44, 9 February 2010
Contents
- 1 Site name:
- 2 Key features of the case study
- 3 Site description
- 4 Measures selection
- 5 Success criteria
- 6 Ecological response
- 7 Hydromorphological response
- 8 Monitoring before and after implementation of the project
- 9 Socio-economic aspects
- 10 Contact person within the organization
- 11 Extra background information
- 12 References
Site name:
Key features of the case study
-> Short summary (max.100 words).
Site description
-> Particular conditions of the site: size, river type, type of pressures, ecological status, etc.
Measures selection
-> Motivation/argumentation behind the selection of the measures implemented.
Success criteria
-> Brief description of the parameters used to assess the success of the project.
Ecological response
-> Brief description of observed effects of the measures over different types of organisms.
- Phytoplankton
- Macrophytes and phytobenthos
- Benthic Invertebrates
- Fish
- Other biota
Hydromorphological response
-> Brief description of observed effects of the measures over different hydromorphological elements.
- Hydrological regime
- River continuity
- Morphological conditions
Monitoring before and after implementation of the project
-> Brief description of available records and data ownership.
Socio-economic aspects
-> Brief description of socio-economic conditions in the site of the project and how the implementation of the project affects other ecosystem goods and services (e.g. recreation, water purification, flood protection, forestry, etc)
- Ecosystem goods and services:
- Conflicts and synergies:
- Project costs:
Contact person within the organization
-> Full name and email address of a person within the organisation that implemented the project who can provide more detailed information.
Extra background information
-> Any other information about the project can be listed here. Links can be made to other websites where the project is mentioned. Support documents can be uploaded (e.g. photos, pdf files).
References
-> Please acknowledge all sources of information used to write this wiki page.
