Difference between revisions of "Bakenhof - Dyke relocation"

From REFORM wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Measures selection)
(Success criteria)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
==Success criteria==
 
==Success criteria==
 +
No clear success criteria for the project were found.
  
 
==Ecological response==
 
==Ecological response==

Revision as of 15:35, 14 June 2010

Bakenhof - Dyke relocation


Factsheet: Bakenhof - Dyke relocation

General
Country NL
River Name Nederrijn
Site Name Bakenhof - Dyke relocation
River Characterisation
    River typology
    Location (Lat Lon) 51.9689663046676, 5.9230899810791
    Altitude lowland: < 200 m
    Catchment area large: > 1000 - 10000 km2
    Geology Siliceous
    National code/
    River type name
    R7
    Hydromorphological quality elements

    Biological quality elements
    Ecosystem Services
    EU Directives
    Pressures
    Measures
    Other
    Project size 45 ha
    Approximate costs 100 000 - 1 000 000 Euros
    Synergy Recreation
    Status Realised
    Period of realization 2001-2004
    Evaluation Ecological change
    Implemented by Rijkswaterstaat & Staatsbosbeheer


    Key features of the case study

    Site description

    The Nederrijn (or Lower Rhine) is a branch of the Dutch part of the Rhine river. It starts at the city of Arnhem, near the site of this project, and continues up to the city of Wijk bij Duursteden where the river continues as the river Lek. Along the Nederrijn on the outskirts of Arnhem a number of floodplains are situated on the southern bank. On the northern bank there is an entrance to a harbour. The southern floodplains were largely cut off from river dynamics due to a laterally placed dyke. Also, river banks were fixated and groins were placed in the channel to keep it open for navigational purposes.

    Measures selection

    To increase the available natural area and to promote natural processes the dyke on the southern side of the river was relocated 200 meters inland over a reach of 1,4 kilometres. This meant that a number of previously agricultural lands were claimed for natural development. Also, a side channel was dug to increase the lateral connection to the floodplains. This side channel was created by creating two openings in the old dyke and deepening the floodplain between the new and the old dyke. This led to an artificial channel without bank fixation where natural processes like erosion and sedimentation can take place.

    Success criteria

    No clear success criteria for the project were found.

    Ecological response

    Hydromorphological response

    Monitoring before and after implementation of the project

    Socio-economic aspects

    Contact person within the organization

    Extra background information

    References


    Related Measures

    Related Pressures