Difference between revisions of "Category:Case studies"
m |
|||
(58 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | The case studies presented below are a compilation of examples of river restoration and rehabilitation projects describing the effect that given measures may have on the hydromorphology and ecology of different water bodies. These examples are intended to provide practitioners with valuable information about the applicability of different measures. | |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | There are various ways of accessing the information: | ||
− | + | * Click on the icon in the map to see the information for a given case study. | |
− | + | * Use the '''Filter''' menu below of the map to select case studies for particular criteria. | |
− | *Use the '''Filter''' menu to select | + | |
− | <br> | + | * Use the alphabetical list of case studies further below the map. |
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | == REFORM river restoration field research sites== | ||
+ | One of the aims in REFORM was to analyze the effects of restoration measures throughout Europe ([http://www.reformrivers.eu/study-sites click here for more info]). Special field study sites were selected for this. Each study site was targeted with the same array of methods, covering floodplain hydromorphology, river hydromorphology, stable isotopes (N and C), riparian vegetation, macrophytes, benthic invertebrates and fish. The REFORM sites are part of the wiki, and links to their wiki pages are given in the table below.<br /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | {| class="center" style="text-align:left" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |colspan="2" style="text-align: left;" | '''REFORM river restoration case-study sites''' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |height="30px"|[[Drava_-_Kleblach|AT_R1: Drava River near Kleblach, Austria]]|| [[Enns_-_Aich|AT_R2: River Enns near Aich, Austria]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | height="30px"|[[Thur|CH_R1: Thur river near Altikon, Switzerland]]|| [[Töss|CH_R2: Töss river, Switzerland]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |height="30px"| [[Becva|CZ_R1: Becva river,Czech Republic]] || [[Morava|CZ_R1: CZ_R2: Morava river, Czech Republic]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |height="50px"| [[Ruhr_Binnerfeld|DM_R1: Ruhr river near Binnerfeld, Germany]]|| [[Cölbe|DM_R2: Lahn river near Cölbe, Germany]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |height="30px"| [[Vääräjoki_-_Niskakoski|FI_R1: Vääräjoki river, Finnland]]|| [[KUIVAJOKI|FI_R2: Kuivajoki river, Finnland]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |height="30px"| [[Emån_-_Emsfors|SE_R1: Emån river, Sweden]]|| [[Mörrumsån_-_Hemsjö|SE_R2: Mörrumsån river, Sweden]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | height="30px"|[[Skjern_-_LIFE project|DK_R1: Skern river, Denmark]]|| [[Stora|DK_R2: Stora river, Denmark]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | height="30px"|[[Lippeaue_Klostermersch|DL_R1: Lippe river Klostermersch, Germany]]|| [[Spree_-_Restoration_and_remeandering_of_the_Müggelspree_-_downstream_Mönchwinkel|DL_R2: Spree river Mönchswinkel, Germany]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |height="30px"|[[Regge_Velderberg|NL_R1: Regge river, Netherlands]] || [[Dommel_Eindhoven|NL_R2: Dommel river, Netherlands]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | height="30px"|[[Narew_river_restoration_project|PL_R1: Narew river, Poland]]|| [[Middle_Warta_River_Valley|PL_R2: Warta river, Poland]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | <br /> | |
− | <br> | + | |
− | + | == River restoration case studies == | |
+ | <projectmap></projectmap> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Every case study has a separate wiki-page, on this page you find: | ||
+ | * A [[Template_factsheet|factsheet]] summarizes the basic information about the project. | ||
+ | * A wiki page contains the factsheet, a google map indicating the location of the project, and a [[Template_casestudies|free-text section]] where a more detailed description of the project can be given. | ||
+ | * Extra background information can be uploaded at the bottom of the wiki page. This can be in the form of reports in their original language or links to other sources of information. | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" style="color:black; background-color:#ffffcc;" cellpadding="5px" > | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | '''Use the information with caution:''' | ||
+ | The REFORM consortium does not take responsibility for the veracity and completeness of the information presented here, and is not liable for the use that third parties may give to it. Practitioners are urged to review the information critically, duly considering the original sources and the intrinsic differences between study sites which may affect the transferability of results. | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> |
Latest revision as of 10:33, 7 January 2019
The case studies presented below are a compilation of examples of river restoration and rehabilitation projects describing the effect that given measures may have on the hydromorphology and ecology of different water bodies. These examples are intended to provide practitioners with valuable information about the applicability of different measures.
There are various ways of accessing the information:
- Click on the icon in the map to see the information for a given case study.
- Use the Filter menu below of the map to select case studies for particular criteria.
- Use the alphabetical list of case studies further below the map.
REFORM river restoration field research sites
One of the aims in REFORM was to analyze the effects of restoration measures throughout Europe (click here for more info). Special field study sites were selected for this. Each study site was targeted with the same array of methods, covering floodplain hydromorphology, river hydromorphology, stable isotopes (N and C), riparian vegetation, macrophytes, benthic invertebrates and fish. The REFORM sites are part of the wiki, and links to their wiki pages are given in the table below.
River restoration case studies
Every case study has a separate wiki-page, on this page you find:
- A factsheet summarizes the basic information about the project.
- A wiki page contains the factsheet, a google map indicating the location of the project, and a free-text section where a more detailed description of the project can be given.
- Extra background information can be uploaded at the bottom of the wiki page. This can be in the form of reports in their original language or links to other sources of information.
Use the information with caution: The REFORM consortium does not take responsibility for the veracity and completeness of the information presented here, and is not liable for the use that third parties may give to it. Practitioners are urged to review the information critically, duly considering the original sources and the intrinsic differences between study sites which may affect the transferability of results. |
Pages in category "Case studies"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 211 total.
(previous 200) (next 200)